As Dr. Thomas Shepherd
points out, the title of Myrtle Fillmore’s book, How to Let God Help You, seems to suggest that there is something
called God. To understand Myrtle’s view on God, we must first understand more
about Myrtle.
In seminary, we are
taught that each person’s thought process is significantly impacted by the
world in which we live. For example, raised in Pennsylvania, I was taught
that wearing white shoes before Easter and after Labor Day was socially unacceptable.
I assumed this fashionistic tradition was held by all, until I met someone from sunny California
who found the no white notion absolutely
absurd. In retrospect, it does seem like a silly practice, but to this day, I
can’t wear white shoes after Labor Day without feeling a twinge of guilt! Like
it or not, our backgrounds shape the way we see the world. We view the world
through our own unique lenses.
To understand
Myrtles theology, it is helpful to understand her lenses, especially her
religious and academic lenses. We can sum up Myrtle’s background by
using her own word, “decidedly eclectic.”
Myrtle was raised in a very strict Methodist
home, even after leaving home and becoming a teacher, she remained active in
the Methodist faith. Myrtle never left the Methodist church to form a new
religion, she brought her evolving consciousness to her current faith.
Myrtle
was also impacted by the training she received at Oberlin College, a progressive
school where she was exposed to alternative thoughts, including transcendentalism.
In researching Oberlin College, I found this on their website's landing
page:
TIVITY,
Oberlin is a place of intense energy and creativity,
Oberlin is a place of intense energy and creativity,
built on a foundation
of academic, artistic, & musical
excellence.
With its longstanding
commitments to
access, diversity, & inclusion, Oberlin is the ideal laboratory
access, diversity, & inclusion, Oberlin is the ideal laboratory
in which to study and design the world we want.
It’s extremely probable that those words perfectly express the impact Oberlin made on the young Myrtle's life.
Keeping Myrtle’s diverse
background in mind, what does the Unity co-founder say about God? In her own word
she writes,
“First of all, remember that God is omnipresent— as present as the very life in which you live, move, and have your being; the very substance out of which your body is formed and nourished; the very intelligence which is within you, in every nerve, brain cell, and structure of the body...” Later she adds, “God is the very intelligence within us. She further proclaims, "We should declare that there is one Intelligence, one Power, one Life, and one Substance. [i]”
While Myrtle sees God as
the intelligence within, at times, she, also, seems to speak of God out there.
In chapter one, she refers to God as, “The Great Schoolmaster knows just what problems
we need to keep us alert.” She also states that as God’s Children, “we place
ourselves in God’s keeping … and it directs us in ways of peace and
pleasantness.” She also uses dualistic wording like, "When you have come to the place where you are ready to co-operate with the Source of all good —your indwelling Lord— you are bound to receive His help."
At times, it does seem Myrtle refers to the Christ Mind in us, and at other times she seems to be speaking of a separate God who is keeping us, directing us and who created us. Is there a contradiction? If Myrtle believed in One Omnipresent Power, is it possible she would have no problem believing both are true? Was Myrtle New thought, Methodist, Oberlinian, or decidedly eclectic? Do we try to put a theology on Myrtle because of our own theological lenses?
I, also, suspect another reason Myrtle spoke in, seemingly, dualistic language is simply because she was a gifted teacher. Myrtle understood the need to speak to people in a context and language they understood. The biblical Jesus demonstrated this same insight when he spoke to the people simply, and in parables.
I, also, suspect another reason Myrtle spoke in, seemingly, dualistic language is simply because she was a gifted teacher. Myrtle understood the need to speak to people in a context and language they understood. The biblical Jesus demonstrated this same insight when he spoke to the people simply, and in parables.
Myrtle challenged the thinking
and culture of her time by writing, “No doubt you have learned from your Bible
that the Spirit of God dwells in man and gives him breath, and that man has a
soul and a physical body. But have you
really studied these facts?” It’s a question, still relevant today!
[i] Myrtle,
Fillmore (2013-06-04). How to Let God Help You (Unity Classic Library Series) Unity
Books. Kindle Edition.
(Per class assignment: All quotes are taken from
chapters one through three.)
Beth, I was raised in New York and I had to smile when I read your comments about after Easter and after Labor day. My lens was "after Memorial Day and up through Labor Day." The color of ties changed in this period-- as well as the "social" ok to put on shorts in certain situations.
ReplyDeleteI think I might have had a somewhat different take than you on reading Myrtle's words this week. I see her as seeing God/Spirit as being both within us and without us. Both were just as real-- and united as one. The "out there" God being the same as the "within you" God. She often uses the same exact words to describe both-- and sees them as a unity. I guess you could say that she really means it when talking about the God "within" and just uses it as a social convention when speaking about a God 'without." But I don't see the strong justification to take Myrtle's words at face value in one situation and then see them as only "social conventions" in the other situation.
I, of course, could be wrong about the above. And I look forward to more reading in this class and electronic discussions. Thanks for your post.
Discussing Myrtle's flagrantly dualistic language, you write: "She also states that as God’s Children, 'we place ourselves in God’s keeping … and it directs us in ways of peace and pleasantness.' She also uses dualistic wording like, 'When you have come to the place where you are ready to co-operate with the Source of all good —your indwelling Lord— you are bound to receive His help.'"
ReplyDeleteIf she did not mean God is out there, why did she continuously speak about God the Father and teach people how to receive divine blessings from God? Did she mean God can be found inside us, but also out there? Does that make God the Supreme Being, or the Supreme Principle?
I suspect many of us will discover ideas in Myrtle which are on the defensive in Unity today. If so, does that indicate we have moved beyond her thought, or, less charitably, "all we like sheep have gone astray....:" ? (Shepherd humor...tame but lame.)
Whole other issue (discussion not required): How much authority should we award to the Mother of Unity in our theologies today?
DrTom
Beth - To be sure, Myrtle’s background and the influences on her--her family, education and the culture of her time--had an impact on her language and understanding. Great schoolmaster? Really? We’re nit-picking through her writing as if we expected to find useable kitchenware from an archaeological dig! Unity may be built upon the foundational thinking of Myrtle and Charles, but we’ve surely taken off from there, expanding and clarifying to create a theological understanding that transcends outdated language. Imposing our now think on Myrtle’s then think has to be wild goose chase. Whatever it is she actually believed, so far she’s leaving me with the impression of an external God who does stuff in separate and inscrutable ways, if perhaps for our own good. More will be revealed, I’m sure. Meanwhile, are you also wondering if we are approaching Myrtle’s writing as an 'all or nothing’ theological proposition? Heck, I also grew up under white shoe restrictions… along with pillbox hats and white gloves, for goodness sakes. The truth about anachronisms is they are anachronistic. Why aren’t we recognizing Myrtle as a product of her time instead of trying to impose her onto ours? Thank you for your perspective.
ReplyDeleteThis reminds me of my last class with Dr. Rev. Jesse Tanner (did I put those in the correct order?). It is impossible to read Myrtle, Charles, Emerson, or the Bible through any lenses other than our own and it is impossible to not be influenced by those lenses. However, the task of exegesis helps us to shed light on what we might not understand. Knowing more about the socio-economic-political structure as well as local customs and practices assists us in our understanding. No, we can never know exactly what an author was thinking or trying to express (heck, sometimes they don't even know themselves after they re-read something they wrote years previously), but the fun and the discovery is in expanding our minds and examining the possibilities. Thanks for helping us to open to the possibilities, Beth. And I still can't wear white shoes after Labor Day, except sandals in Florida. :)
ReplyDeleteBeth,
ReplyDeleteExcellent perspective on the polarity of Myrtle's work. If we aren't sure ourselves in Unity how to explain Myrtle's work what are we to do? How are we supposed to teach or explain the polarity when we ourselves can't agree or define her work? A great mystery continues... Perhaps by the end of this course we will have a bit more clarity on Myrtle and her beliefs, where we see ourselves going etc.. I can't wait to discover and dive deeper into Myrtle's teachings. I anticipate we will uncover more hidden secrets.
Hi Beth,
ReplyDeleteYour essay was a fun read. When you said, "While Myrtle sees God as the intelligence within, at times, she, also, seems to speak of God out there." I'm reminded of a little affirmation I have taped to my computer monitor. It reads, "TRUST - God knows what he's doing." A Unity friend took me to task over it, pointing out that it personifies God. Indeed it does, I agreed sheepishly. I definitely don't believe in that kind of God! But sometimes I find it's a useful technique as a reminder that gets my attention in as few words as possible. Is it possible she did the same thing? - Doug